The withdrawal agreement also contains provisions for the United Kingdom to leave the Convention setting the status of European schools, with the United Kingdom bound by the Convention and accompanying regulations on accredited European schools until the end of the last academic year of the transition period, i.e. at the end of the spring semester 2020-2021.  The first paragraph does not apply where protection in the EU is derived from international agreements to which the Union is a party. with regard to the procedures covered by Article 29, paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, Directive 2009/81/EC, Article 33, paragraph 2, Directive 2009/81/EC. 2 to 5 of the 2014/24/EU Directive and Article 51, paragraph 2, of the 2014/25/EU Directive, which deals with the implementation of the following framework agreements concluded by adjudicating powers or contracting entities of the Member States or the United Kingdom, including contracting on the basis of such framework agreements: the draft withdrawal agreement and the political declaration can have a significant impact on the British Constitution. Some of the constitutional issues that are likely to arise in each bill on the implementation of the withdrawal agreement are as follows: the UK`s participation in the EIB group after the withdrawal date After the second defeat of May`s divorce agreement, the European Council met on 21 March in Brussels to decide what to do next. EU leaders have given May two options: postpone Brexit until 22 May if MPs vote in favour of the withdrawal deal, or postpone it until 12 April if they vote against the deal. If the deal fails again in Parliament, May could ask for a lengthy extension. The 2019 revisions also adapted elements of the political declaration and replaced the word “appropriate” with “appropriate” with respect to labour standards. According to Sam Lowe, a trade fellow at the Centre for European Reform, the amendment excludes labour standards from dispute resolution mechanisms.  In addition, the Equal Competition Mechanism has been postponed from the legally binding withdrawal agreement to the political declaration, and the line of the political statement that “the United Kingdom will consider taking into account alignment with trade union rules in the relevant areas” has been removed.  On 15 January 2019, the House of Commons voted with 230 votes against the Brexit withdrawal agreement, the largest vote against the British government in history.  The government may survived a vote of confidence the next day.
 On March 12, 2019, the House of Commons voted 149 votes against the agreement, the fourth-biggest defeat of the government in the history of the House of Commons.  A third vote on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, widely expected on 19 March 2019, was rejected by the House of Commons spokesman on 18 March 2019, on the basis of a parliamentary convention of 2 April 1604, which prevented British governments from forcing the House of Commons to vote several times on a subject already voted on by the House of Commons.    An abbreviated version of the withdrawal agreement, in which the annex political statement had been withdrawn, consisted of the test of “substantial amendments,” so that a third vote was held on 29 March 2019, but was rejected by 58 votes.  CONSIDERING that the provisions of this Protocol should ensure the proper implementation and application of the relevant provisions of EU law with regard to the basic sovereign territories after the UK`s withdrawal from the EU, the agreement defines the products, services and procedures associated with them.